Article 199 in the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by legislation." It's very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether People remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
This Court may possibly interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding attained by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your conclusion or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court may interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mould the relief to make it ideal into the facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified by the decision with the Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are certainly not binding, but could possibly be used as persuasive authority, which is to offer substance on the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. 12. There is no denial from the fact that in Government service it is anticipated that the persons getting their character higher than board, free from any moral stigma, are to become inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is often a condition precedent for appointment to a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above mentioned is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a way out or guise to perform away with the candidature on the petitioner. Read more
The presiding judge emphasized the need to address the evolving techniques utilized by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological aspects allows for your more extensive legal reaction.
Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment of the grid project and submitted that adequate mitigation measures were in place to render any probable adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted being crafted.
Electronic and paper court records retained with the court site may be viewed with the courthouse for free, however there is a price of ten cents for each page to print from a public access terminal.
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, such as eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature of your seized currency.
I) The above mentioned referred case FIR, for your murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered about the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid that's father of the petitioner and According to story of FIR, the petitioner can be an eyewkness on the incidence.
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses for example self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which may possibly lead to reduced charges or acquittal.
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to some person, by undertaking an act which during the ordinary course of nature is probably going to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently dangerous that it must in all probability cause death, causes the death from the these person, is alleged to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
Because of this, basically citing the case is more more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Visualize it as calling anyone to tell them you’ve found their misplaced phone, then telling them you live in these types of-and-this kind of neighborhood, without actually giving them an address. Driving throughout the community endeavoring to find their phone is likely to be more frustrating than it’s truly worth.
competent authority has determined the more info eligibility of your private respondents and found them being match for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)